OluWe Read 84,580 Ablo Reviews. Here Is What Users Loved and What Drove Them Away
Original research: every Google Play review of Ablo, read in date order, 2019 to 2026. The star ratings by year, the top praise, the top complaints, and the changes that caused each wave.
Updated 18 September 2026 · 5 min read
On this page
Ablo left behind one of the largest public records any social app has: tens of thousands of reviews, in more than a dozen languages, written across its whole life and for four years after its death.
We read all of them.
How we did it
- Collection: every review Google Play would return for the original app (
live.ablo) across 15 locales: 86,475 rows, 84,580 after removing duplicates. - Reading: sorted by date with identical texts collapsed, that left 68,859 lines. We split them into 31 chunks and read every line, noting mechanics, praise, complaints, feature requests, regional patterns and the dates people first described each change.
- Other sources: the Product Hunt launch comments (22 January 2019), and background coverage of the Google Play award and Match Group.
A caveat that matters: counts like "hundreds of mentions" are estimates from reading, not the output of a classifier. Treat them as rankings. And because the developer replied to about 95% of reviews with a template ("Keep flying with Ablo"), replies tell us nothing.
The ratings
| Stars | Reviews |
|---|---|
| 5★ | 42,835 |
| 4★ | 11,937 |
| 3★ | 8,541 |
| 2★ | 4,958 |
| 1★ | 18,204 |
The shape is a U. The five-star reviews are mostly one-liners ("amazing", "muito bom"). Nearly all the useful information sits in the one- to three-star reviews, which are longer and usually start with some version of "I loved this app until…".
By year
| Year | Reviews | Average | 1★ share | What was happening |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 5,542 | 3.76 | 15% | Launch, the Google Play award, free flights, coins from August |
| 2020 | 22,348 | 3.63 | 19% | Lockdown boom; prices tripled, then 10 flights a day |
| 2021 | 38,715 | 3.65 | 21% | Peak year; Live streaming, then video-first and the translator swap |
| 2022 | 17,308 | 3.57 | 25% | Voice translation removed; shutdown on 30 September |
| 2023–26 | 667 | ~3.1 | ~38% | Grief, "come back" pleas, a broken listing |
Review volume tracks the pandemic. It climbs through 2020 and peaks in June and July 2021 at more than 4,000 a month. After the spring 2022 removals it collapses, months before the shutdown.
What users loved
- Real-time translation. Top praise in every year and every language. A Chinese reviewer in 2021 said it was more accurate than Baidu's translator.
- Meeting the world for free. "Like a travel agency which doesn't charge anything."
- Language practice. Russian, Turkish and Spanish speakers in particular wrote about improving their English quickly.
- The flight concept. Planes, miles and destination trivia, loved by name. "I travelled without leaving home."
- Relief from loneliness, especially during lockdowns.
- No ads in the early years.
What drove them away
- Opaque bans. The largest source of one-star reviews. A single report could ban you with no reason. Appeals were email-only and rarely answered. One account per device meant a second-hand phone could arrive already banned. People who reported harassment said they were banned while harassers were not. A ban deleted your friends too. (More)
- A paywalled core. Picking a gender or continent, reconnecting with a friend, even a match who left instantly: all cost coins. Euro prices hurt users paid in lira, rubles and pesos, and many users had no card at all.
- Harassment, especially after video became the default.
- The age rating. A 12+ store rating for an 18+ app. Probably the most repeated single complaint, every day, every language, from 2019 to 2022. (More)
- The same countries every time. Free flights mostly landed wherever the most people were online. Users read it as rigged. (More)
- Translation removed or degraded. From November 2021 this became the biggest complaint of all. (More)
- Logins and outages, including at least five global outages. (More)
- Gender imbalance, which moderation and paid filters made worse, not better.
- Removing features people used. Text-first chat, daily free coins, the plane animation, the radio, the web version.
- Privacy. Deleting an account did not delete it, and contacts permission and ID photos were requested.
The changes behind each wave
The sharpest drops in sentiment line up with specific updates. Our Ablo timeline has the full dated list; the headline moments were:
- Late May 2020: 10 free flights a day, and reconnecting with a friend needs a paid gift.
- ~11 November 2021: new matches open straight into video.
- ~20 November 2021: the in-house translator is replaced by forced Google Translate, and you can no longer see your own message translated.
- February to May 2022: live voice translation removed from video. "It was the only app in the world that did this."
Features people asked for, for three years
Asked for in almost every period: deleting or unsending messages; choosing a specific country; online status; voice messages; finding a friend by username; earning coins through ads or daily check-ins.
Smaller but steady: a real dark mode, replying to a specific message, age-range filters, undoing an accidental block, a web version, payment without a bank card, and a non-binary gender option.
Where the reviewers were
English reviews were the largest group (about 22,000, from everywhere). Then Russian, Portuguese (mostly Brazil), Spanish (mostly Latin America), Turkish, French, Indonesian and Arabic at roughly 8,000 each. Each group had its own emphasis: Russian speakers wrote most about the age rating, Spanish speakers wrote the longest and most constructive reviews and the most "come back" pleas, and Turkish speakers called the coin system a "money trap".
After the shutdown
The most-upvoted post-shutdown review, from December 2022, is two words in Spanish: "La extraño." (I miss it.)
Users learned of the closure when login failed. There was no warning and no export. Suggestions to use Azar were rejected almost unanimously. The listing stayed installable for years on a dead backend, collecting one-star "something went wrong" reviews; in 2023–26 about 38% of reviews were one star. The latest "bring Ablo back" review we found is dated 6 August 2026.
What it all means
The reviews tell a consistent story. People did not leave Ablo because they stopped wanting to talk to strangers abroad. They left because the free, text-first, translated experience they fell for was gradually charged for, then replaced with video, and because moderation felt arbitrary.
That is the brief we built Olu against: text first, translation both ways, free to meet people, and a plane that still flies. If you are looking for somewhere to go now, start with our guide to apps like Ablo.
Questions people ask
+What was Ablo's rating on Google Play?
Across 84,580 unique reviews from 2019 to 2026, Ablo averaged 3.64 stars. The distribution was U-shaped: 42,835 five-star and 18,204 one-star reviews.
+What was the most common complaint about Ablo?
Moderation. Users described instant bans after a single report, no reason given, email appeals that went unanswered, and losing every friend with the account.
+What did people like most about Ablo?
Real-time translation that let people with no shared language talk, followed by meeting the world for free, language practice, and the flight and miles concept.
+How was this analysis done?
We collected every review Google Play returned across 15 locales, removed duplicates, sorted them by date and read them in chunks, recording mechanics, praise, complaints, requests and dated changes. Counts are reading estimates, not an automated classifier.
Boarding pass · free
Tap, fly to a random country, and chat with someone who lives there.
Text first, translated both ways, no video, no coins to meet people. Works in your browser.
Take off on OluNew here? Read Ablo App: The Complete Story of the Chat App That Let You Fly Anywhere (2019–2022), the full history in one place.